"Generally non-refundable after substantive work begins" protects Clarity Harbor when the promised professional service was performed well and the customer simply changed their mind. It must never be used to avoid accountability for deficient work, material error, missing deliverables, billing mistakes or failure to perform the contracted service.
Tell us and we start a Customer Care Review. It is asynchronous by default — you do not have to get on a call to be taken seriously.
Step 1. Listen
Ask asynchronously: "What didn't meet your expectations?" Make it easy to explain in their own words. No forced meeting, no requirement to talk to Kirsten. A live conversation is offered only when the customer prefers one or when it would materially improve resolution.
Step 2. Classify the concern
Record one or more classifications from the concern taxonomy. Classification drives routing, not the desired outcome.
Step 3. Internal quality review
Compare the delivered work against the agreement, the product page at time of purchase, the promised deliverables, the approved sample Diagnostic, the Clarity Harbor Method™, the Clarity Lens™, the evidence submitted, the quality standard and the human-review requirement.
Step 4. Correct Clarity Harbor errors
Where Clarity Harbor materially failed, make it right through correction, re-analysis, additional expert review, replacement of a missing deliverable — and, where appropriate, a partial or full refund.
Step 5. Distinguish disagreement from poor quality
Disagreement is not defect. Explain the reasoning, show the evidence, acknowledge uncertainty, invite additional evidence, and reconsider only when new or previously misunderstood evidence warrants it. Never manufacture a more favourable conclusion.
Step 6. Value recovery
Work can satisfy scope and still fail to create value. Determine a bounded additional action that makes the Diagnostic genuinely useful — never unlimited revisions, consulting, meetings or email support.
Step 7. Refund exception review
If reasonable service recovery does not resolve a legitimate material concern, route to Refund Exception Review with a human decision.
Value recovery, kept bounded. Where the work met its scope but did not land usefully, we may clarify recommendations, strengthen prioritization, correct unclear analysis, limited re-review, improve the 30-day action plan, clarify the success hypothesis, explain an important finding more clearly, correct evidence interpretation. What this never becomes: no unlimited revisions, no unlimited consulting, no unlimited meetings, no unlimited email support.
Customer happiness does not mean customer agreement. Clarity Harbor never changes an evidence-supported finding because the customer dislikes the conclusion. If the evidence supports an uncomfortable conclusion, we will explain the reasoning and show the evidence — and we will reconsider if you have evidence we did not see. We will not manufacture a more comfortable conclusion.